Focusing that close without rangefinder coupling is of course quite difficult unless you have live-view. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. Everything is very tactile. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. The upgrade to the M10 feels like its based on some fairly thin justifications, though I suspect (hope) that in practice just like swapping from M9 to M262 I will be pleasantly surprised by the fact that I find it brings more to the table than I expected. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Hes written some good books, too, some with his partner, Frances. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. Unknown. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. There is no way to see the chosen ISO until the shot is taken and checking it in the image preview dialogue. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. Learn how your comment data is processed. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. Yes!! Its back to the basics. Upload or insert images from URL. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. Find out more about 35mmc here. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. Thanks a lot for your replies. No fuss, just compose and shoot. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. Thanks, James. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. We think it rises to the challenge. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. You can post now and register later. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. Simple. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. We were using the Sony cameras for video, so as I often do, I was shooting stills with the Leica. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. By The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. Hi everyone. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. : very useful. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. : Leica M240 . The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. That said, I do miss the live view feature. It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . Seems I do once again. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. I find it to be a useful feature at times. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. The sensor is not the same, by the way. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. Pasted as rich text. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. Its. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. . The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. As I understand technically m240 is similar to m262 (only some features, but not sensor). A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. Another M10 fetish. With some apprehension, I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into the computer. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Paste as plain text instead, You have to ask yourself, . Weight is certainly a thing though! So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! Of course they can, but you have them. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. I posted this as a person of experience. Have a read of this for tips. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Well worth seeking out. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. Of course it didnt. I would still rather have the m10 over all the others though, but I definitely see you point. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. I was wrong! Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M8 A Year with an Ageing Digital Rangefinder By Rui Hu, Panasonic GM1 Review: A Digital ILC Alternative to the Olympus XA2? Can you compare side by side, please? If you half press the shutter to leave the menu without pressing SET the ISO remains what it was set to before. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? Weight savings from the M10 may be there, but with a Thumbs Up in the hot shoe, the M240 feels good and substantial in the hand.ISO setting. But in the context of the fact that functional simplicity is a big part of what attracts people to Leica cameras, its hard not to be impressed by the Leica M262. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. Whats the best camera for around $2000? I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. To be fair, about 30 days of the last six months had the Leica in intensive care at Leica New Jersey so this is technically five months with the M262. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Very interesting. Upload or insert images from URL. The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. A M262 is a friendly camera. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. This is a useful feature for me that I enjoyed using the Fuji system which had a great focus peaking aid. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. I will investigate that. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu.
Skokie Country Club Caddy Program,
Black Funeral Home Carthage, Texas,
Ephesians 1:18 The Message,
Marlin 30 30 Straight Stock For Sale,
Articles L